p. 1
the cervical vertebral maturation cvm method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics tiziano baccetti lorenzo franchi and james a mcnamara jr § the present study introduces a further modified version of the cervical vertebral maturation cvm method for the detection of the peak in mandibular growth based on the analysis of the second through fourth cervical vertebrae in a single cephalogram the morphology of the bodies of the second c2 odontoid process third c3 and fourth c4 cervical vertebrae were analyzed in 6 consecutive cephalometric observations t1 through t6 of 30 orthodontically untreated subjects observations for each subject consisted of two consecutive cephalograms comprising the interval of maximum mandibular growth as assessed by means of the maximum increment in total mandibular length condylion gnathion co-gn together with two earlier consecutive cephalograms and two later consecutive cephalograms the analysis consisted of both visual and cephalometric appraisals of morphological characteristics of the three cervical vertebrae the construction of this new modified version of the cvm method was based on the results of both anova for repeated measures with post hoc scheffé s test p 0.05 and discriminant analysis the new clinically improved cvm method is comprised of six maturational stages cervical stage 1 through cervical stage 6 ie cs1 through cs6 cs1 and cs2 are prepeak stages the peak in mandibular growth occurs between cs3 and cs4 cs6 is recorded at least 2 years after the peak the use of the cvm method enables the clinician to identify optimal timing for the treatment of a series of dentoskeletal disharmonies in all three planes of space semin orthod 11:119 129 © 2005 elsevier inc all rights reserved i n the organization differentiation development and growth of any somatic structure time plays a crucial role in determining the final morphological and dimensional result in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics it is becoming increasingly evident that the timing of the treatment onset may be as critical as the selection of the specific treatment protocol as will be discussed below by beginning a protocol at the individual patient s optimal maturational stage the most favorable response with the least potential morbidity can be anticipated the issue of optimal timing for dentofacial orthopedics is linked intimately to the identification of periods of acceler department of orthodontics university of florence florence italy department of orthodontics and pediatric dentistry school of dentistry university of michigan ann arbor mi school of medicine university of michigan ann arbor mi §center for human growth and development university of michigan ann arbor mi address correspondence to tiziano baccetti dds phd università degli studi di firenze via del ponte di mezzo 46-48 50127 firenze italy e-mail t.baccetti@odonto.unifi.it ated growth that can contribute significantly to the correction of skeletal imbalances in the individual patient cephalometric investigations on longitudinal samples have identified a pubertal spurt in mandibular growth that is characterized by wide individual variations in onset duration and rate.1-6 individual skeletal maturity can be assessed by means of several biologic indicators increase in body height1-3 skeletal maturation of the hand and wrist7-10 dental development and eruption8,11,12 menarche or voice changes9,13,14 and cervical vertebral maturation.15,16 the biologic indicators of skeletal maturity refer mainly to somatic changes at puberty thus emphasizing the strict interactions between the development of the craniofacial region and the modifications in other body regions the reliability and efficiency of a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity can be evaluated with respect to several fundamental requisites.17 an ideal biologic indicator of individual mandibular skeletal maturity should be characterized by at least five features 1 efficacy in detecting the peak in mandibular growth the method should present with a definite stage or 119 1073-8746/05 see front matter © 2005 elsevier inc all rights reserved doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005
[close]
p. 2
120 phase that coincides with the peak in mandibular growth in the majority of subjects no need for additional x-ray exposure ease in recording consistency in the interpretation of the data the interexaminer error in the appraisal of the defined stages or phases should be as low as possible usefulness for the anticipation of the occurrence of the peak the method should present with a definable stage or phase that occurs before the peak in mandibular growth in the majority of subjects t baccetti l franchi and j.a mcnamara subjects and methods the total sample n 706 that comprises the cephalometric files of the university of michigan elementary and secondary school growth study was evaluated.23 due to the longitudinal nature and aim of the present investigation subjects with less than six consecutive annual cephalometric observations n 492 were excluded from the study total mandibular length co-gn was measured on the longitudinal sets of lateral cephalograms for each of the 214 remaining subjects at yearly intervals the lateral cephalograms were analyzed by means of a digitizing tablet numonics lansdale pa and digitizing software viewbox version 3.0 d halazonetis athens greece the maximum increase in co-gn between two consecutive annual cephalograms was used to define the peak in mandibular growth at puberty in the individual subjects two consecutive cephalograms comprising the interval of maximum mandibular growth together with two earlier consecutive cephalograms and two later consecutive cephalograms had to be available for each subject and were included in the study this limited the investigation to 30 subjects 18 males 12 females the morphology of the bodies of the second c2 odontoid process third c3 and fourth c4 cervical vertebrae were analyzed in the six consecutive annual observations t1 through t6 the analysis consisted of both visual and cephalometric appraisals of morphological characteristics of the cervical vertebrae visual analysis the morphology of the three cervical vertebrae c2 c3 c4 on the six consecutive cephalograms t1 through t6 was evaluated by visual inspection two investigators lf and tb performed the appraisal independently the percentage of interexaminer agreement was 96.7 two sets of variables were analyzed 1 presence or absence of a concavity at the lower border of the body of c2 c3 and c4 and 2 shape of the body of c3 and c4 four basic shapes were considered trapezoid the superior border is tapered from posterior to anterior rectangular horizontal the heights of the posterior and anterior borders are equal the superior and inferior borders are longer than the anterior and posterior borders squared the posterior superior anterior and inferior borders are equal and rectangular vertical the posterior and anterior borders are longer than the superior and inferior borders cephalometric analysis on the lateral cephalograms the following points for the description of the morphologic characteristics of the cervical vertebral bodies were traced and digitized fig 1 c2p c2 m c2a the most posterior the deepest and the most anterior points on the lower border of the body of c2 2 3 4 5 the main features of the cervical vertebral maturation cvm method as described previously by franchi and coworkers18 included 1 in nearly 95 of north american subjects a growth interval in cvm coincides with the pubertal peak in both mandibular growth and body height 2 the cervical vertebrae are available on the lateral cephalogram that is used routinely for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning 3 the appraisal of the shape of the cervical vertebrae is straightforward 4 the reproducibility of classifying cvm stages is high 98 by trained examiners 5 the method is useful for the anticipation of the pubertal peak in mandibular growth a subsequent study by our group19 provided a few improvements of the original cvm analysis to make the method easier and applicable to the vast majority of patients 1 a more limited number of vertebral bodies was used to perform the staging as suggested by hassel and farman20 in particular the method included only those cervical vertebrae c2 c3 and c4 that can be visualized when a protective radiation collar is worn by the patient 2 definitions of stages were not based on a comparative assessment of between-stage changes so that stages can be identified easily on a single cephalogram a series of investigations performed in different parts of the world have confirmed the validity of the cvm method mostly by comparing it with the hand and wrist method pancherz and szyska found that the cervical vertebral maturation method has level of reliability comparable to the hand and wrist method.21 by replacing the hand-wrist method with the cvm method an additional radiograph can be avoided thus reducing the patient s total radiation dose grave and townsend also have confirmed the validity of the cvm method in australian aborigines.22 the aim of the present article is to present a further modified and refined version of the cvm method and its validity for the appraisal of mandibular skeletal maturity in the individual patient in light of the findings of recent studies in which the cvm method has been used to assess optimal timing for the treatment of malocclusions in the transverse sagittal and vertical planes of space.
[close]
p. 3
the cvm method and treatment timing 121 border of c3 distance from the line connecting c3lp and c3la to the deepest point on the lower border of the vertebra c3 m c4conc a measure of the concavity depth at the lower border of c4 distance from the line connecting c4lp and c4la to the deepest point on the lower border of the vertebra c4 m c3bar ratio between the length of the base distance c3lp-c3la and the anterior height distance c3uac3la of the body of c3 c3par ratio between the posterior distance c3up-c3lp and anterior distance c3ua-c3la heights of the body of c3 c4bar ratio between the length of the base distance c4lp-c4la and the anterior height distance c4uac4la of the body of c4 c4par ratio between the posterior distance c4up-c4lp and anterior distance c4ua-c4la heights of the body of c4 statistical analysis the significance of the prevalence rates for the morphologic characteristics of the cervical vertebrae was evaluated at each observation time by means of the chisquared test with yates correction p 0.05 descriptive statistics were obtained for total mandibular length and for vertebral cephalometric measures at each of the six consecutive observations t1 through t6 the differences between the mean values for all the computed variables at the six consecutive stages were tested for significance by means of anova for repeated measurements with post hoc scheffé s test p 0.05 the cephalometric measurements of the bodies of the cervical vertebrae at each interval between consecutive cephalograms were analyzed by means of a multivariate statistical approach discriminant analysis to identify those vertebral morphologic variables mostly accounting for the differences between two consecutive observations a stepwise variable selection forward selection procedure was performed with the goal of obtaining a model with the smallest set of significant cephalometric variables f to enter and to remove 4 finally the classifying power of selected cephalometric variables was tested all statistical computations were performed by means of computer software spss for windows version 10.0.0 spss inc chicago il figure 1 cephalometric landmarks for the quantitative analysis of the morphologic characteristics of the vertebral bodies of c2 c3 and c4 c3up c3ua the most superior points of the posterior and anterior borders of the body of c3 c3lp c3 m c3la the most posterior the deepest and the most anterior points on the lower border of the body of c3 c4up c4ua the most superior points of the posterior and anterior borders of the body of c4 c4lp c4 m c4la the most posterior the deepest and the most anterior points on the lower border of the body of c4 for the location of landmarks the indications described by hellsing were adopted partially.24 with the aid of these landmarks the following measurements were performed c2conc a measure of the concavity depth at the lower border of c2 distance from the line connecting c2p and c2a to the deepest point on the lower border of the vertebra c2 m c3conc a measure of the concavity depth at the lower results the findings of the visual analysis of the morphologic characteristics of cervical vertebrae c2 c3 c4 are reported in table 1 the features of the examined vertebrae at the six consecutive observations can be summarized as follows t1 the lower border of c2 is flat in the vast majority of subjects at this stage a concavity is evident at the lower border of c2 in only 7 of the individuals examined a percentage that is not significant the concavity is absent at the lower borders of both c3 and c4 in 100 of the subjects the bodies of both c3 and c4 are trapezoid in shape.
[close]
p. 4
122 14 46.7 16 53.3 0 0 30 100 18 60 12 40 15 50 15 50 16 53.3 14 46.7 16 53.3 14 46.7 14 46.7 16 53.3 0 0 30 100 30 100 30 100 t baccetti l franchi and j.a mcnamara t2 a concavity is present at the lower border of c2 in 80 of the subjects the observation at t2 is characterized also by the absence of a concavity at the lower borders of c3 with the nonsignificant exception of 7 of the subjects and of c4 both c3 and c4 still are trapezoid in shape with the nonsignificant exceptions of 3 and 13 of the subjects showing rectangular horizontal bodies for c3 and c4 respectively t3 a concavity is present at the lower border of c2 100 of the subjects and of c3 with the nonsignificant exception of 7 of the subjects no concavity is present at the lower border of c4 with the nonsignificant exception of 10 of the cases the shape of both c3 and c4 may be either trapezoid or rectangular horizontal t4 this observation is characterized by the presence of a concavity at the lower borders of c2 c3 with the nonsignificant exception of 7 of the cases and c4 with the nonsignificant exception of 13 of the cases the bodies of both c3 and c4 now are rectangular horizontal in shape 100 of the subjects t5 a concavity is present at the lower borders of c2 c3 with the nonsignificant exception of 3 of the cases and c4 with the nonsignificant exception of 3 of the cases the body of c3 is rectangular horizontal in 40 of the cases and squared in the remaining subjects the body of c4 is rectangular horizontal in 47 of the cases and squared in the remaining subjects t6 a concavity is present at the lower borders of all the three examined cervical vertebrae the body of c3 is squared in 50 of the cases and rectangular vertical in the remaining 50 of the cases the body of c4 is squared in 53 of the cases and rectangular vertical in the remaining subjects descriptive statistics for the cephalometric measurements of vertebral morphologic characteristics are reported in table 2 together with the statistical comparisons between consecutive observations no significant differences for any of the measurements were assessed between t1 and t2 with the exception of a significant increase in the depth of the concavity at the lower border of the second cervical vertebra c2conc the depth of the concavities at the lower borders of both the second c2conc and the third c3conc cervical vertebra is significantly greater at t3 when compared with t2 in the transition from t2 to t3 the height of the anterior border of both c3 and c4 increases significantly thus leading to significant decrements in the ratio between the heights of the posterior and anterior borders of the vertebral bodies c3par and c4par at t4 the depth of the concavity at the lower border of c4 c4conc becomes significantly greater than at t3 in the transition from t3 to t4 the height of the anterior borders of both c3 and c4 increases significantly again thus leading to significant decreases both in the ratio between the heights of the posterior and anterior borders of the vertebral bodies c3par and c4par and in the ratio between the length of the base and the anterior height of the vertebral bodies c3bar and c4bar on average c3par and c4par now t6 30 100 30 100 30 100 0 0 0 0 30 100 3 10 27 90 26 86.7 4 13.3 29 96.7 1 3.3 1 3.3 23 76.7 7 23.3 0 0 30 100 0 0 30 100 4 13.3 15 50 15 50 0 0 30 100 0 0 30 100 30 100 0 0 30 100 0 0 30 100 0 0 30 100 15 50 0 0 yes 15 50 0 0 0 0 no t5 30 100 29 96.7 12 40 0 0 30 100 30 100 table 1 results of qualitative analysis of cervical vertebral characteristics at the six consecutive observations t4 28 93.3 7 23.3 23 76.7 30 100 30 100 30 100 0 0 0 0 15 50 30 100 30 100 t3 28 93.3 28 93.3 30 100 26 86.7 15 50 30 100 0 0 30 100 0 0 29 96.7 t2 concavity at the lower border of c2 2 6.7 28 93.3 24 80 concavity at the lower border of c3 0 0 30 100 2 6.7 concavity at the lower border of c4 0 0 30 100 0 0 c3 shape trapezoid 30 100 0 0 29 96.7 c4 shape trapezoid 30 100 0 0 26 86.7 c3 shape rectangular horiz 0 0 30 100 1 3.3 c4 shape rectangular horiz 0 0 30 100 4 13.3 c3 shape squared 0 0 30 100 0 0 c4 shape squared 0 0 30 100 0 0 c3 shape rectangular vert 0 0 30 100 0 0 c4 shape rectangular vert 0 0 30 100 0 0 t1 yes no yes 30 100 6 20 no 0 0 yes 30 100 0 0 2 6.7 no 0 0 yes 30 100 2 6.7 0 0 0 0 no 0 0 yes 30 100 1 3.3 18 60 0 0 no
[close]
p. 5
the cvm method and treatment timing table 2 results of quantitative analysis descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons anova for repeated measurements with post hoc scheffe s test on the measurements at the six consecutive cephalometric observations 2.53 1.08 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 se 123 have a ratio of approximately 1:1 an indication that both c3 and c4 vertebral bodies are rectangular horizontal in shape t5 and t6 are characterized by decrements of the ratio between the length of the base and the anterior height of the vertebral bodies c3bar and c4bar the mean values for these measurements indicate that the vertebral bodies become progressively more squared in shape at t6 one third of the cases show a rectangular vertical shape of one or both c3 and c4 vertebral bodies discriminant analysis revealed that the forming concavity at the lower border of c2 can account for 80 of the differences between t1 and t2 the depth of c3conc becomes the discriminant variable between t2 and t3 with a classifying power of 75 the difference in the posteroanterior ratio of c3 c3par together with the depth of the concavity at the lower border of c4 c4conc are the discriminant factors between t3 and t4 classifying power equal to 85 c3par in association with both the ratio between the length of the base and the anterior height of c3 c3bar and c4conc are able to discriminate between t4 and t5 in 88 of the cases the ratios for c3 c3bar and c3par together with the depth of the concavity at the lower border of c2 c2conc are the discriminant variables between t5 and t6 in 80 of the cases 141.17 118.05 1.58 1.36 1.07 0.98 1.39 1.01 1.36 mean 14.42 5.83 0.37 0.64 0.53 0.08 0.14 0.06 0.12 t4 sd 2.63 1.06 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 se 153.30 119.63 1.91 1.85 1.77 0.98 1.20 1.00 1.19 mean 14.41 5.91 0.40 0.60 0.60 0.06 0.15 0.07 0.18 t5 sd 2.63 1.08 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.03 se 166.00 121.77 2.23 2.40 2.28 0.99 1.03 0.97 1.04 mean 13.83 5.93 0.48 0.68 0.63 0.06 0.13 0.05 0.12 t6 sd discussion the modifications in the size and shape of the cervical vertebrae in growing subjects have gained increasing interest during the past few decades as a biological indicator of individual skeletal maturity one of the main reasons for the increasing popularity of the method is that the analysis of cervical vertebral maturation is performed on the lateral cephalogram a type of film used routinely in orthodontic diagnosis the objective of the present investigation was to provide a refinement of the method through the definition of six stages cervical stages 1 to 6 for a more practical application in dentofacial orthopedics and more specifically a direct appraisal of the skeletal maturity of the mandible in relation to the morphological features of the cervical vertebrae an evaluation of the morphological features of the cervical vertebral bodies restricted to those that are visible on the lateral cephalogram even when a protective collar is worn as originally proposed by hassel and farman20 a definition of the cervical vertebral morphology at each developmental stage that allows the clinician to apply the cvm method on the basis of the information derived from a single cephalogram the assessment of individual stages in cervical vertebral maturation through the comparative analysis of between-stage changes should be avoided the anatomical features of the second odontoid process third and fourth cervical vertebrae were evaluated here as visualized on lateral cephalograms in a time interval ranging on average from 2 years before to 2 years after the peak in mandibular growth the description of the consecutive 128.73 112.63 1.15 0.95 0.31 1.16 1.61 1.15 1.59 indicates statistical significance with respect to the preceding observation mean se t2 t1 sd mean se sd mean age months co-gn mm c2conc mm c3conc mm c4conc mm c3par ratio c3bar ratio c4par ratio c4bar ratio 104.67 107.85 0.44 0.01 0.03 1.35 1.85 1.34 1.83 15.12 5.33 0.46 0.41 0.31 0.15 0.24 0.13 0.25 2.76 0.97 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.05 116.40 110.32 0.76 0.36 0.12 1.26 1.77 1.25 0.71 14.84 5.68 0.49 0.49 0.29 0.16 0.23 0.14 0.22 2.71 1.04 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.04 14.99 5.78 0.44 0.53 0.39 0.12 0.15 0.17 0.21 t3 sd 2.74 1.06 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 se
[close]
p. 6
124 t baccetti l franchi and j.a mcnamara figure 2 schematic representation of the stages of cervical vertebrae according to the newly modified method stages in vertebral development consisted of a noncomparative definition of morphological characteristics at each observation the findings of both the visual qualitative and cephalometric quantitative analyses revealed that a statistically significant discrimination can be made between the initial two stages in cervical vertebral maturation only according to the difference in depth of the concavity at the lower border of the second cervical vertebra a definite concavity at the lower border of c2 is present in 80 of the subjects at cervical stage 2 the appearance of a visible concavity at the lower border of the third cervical vertebra is the anatomic characteristic that mostly accounts for the identification of the stage immediately preceding the peak in mandibular growth cervical stage 3 the distinction among cvs 4 cvs 5 and cvs 6 as defined in the former cvm method is possible only by using the shape of the bodies of c3 and/or c4 as a discriminant factor.18 the peak in mandibular growth will occur during the year after this stage cervical stage 4 cs4 fig 6 concavities at the lower borders of c2 c3 and c4 now are present the bodies of both c3 and c4 are rectangular horizontal in shape the peak in mandibular growth has occurred within 1 or 2 years before this stage cervical stage 5 cs5 fig 7 the concavities at the lower borders of c2 c3 and c4 still are present at least one of the bodies of c3 and c4 is squared in shape if not squared the body of the other cervical vertebra still is rectangular horizontal the peak in mandibular growth has ended at least 1 year before this stage stages of cervical vertebral maturation the stages of cervical vertebral maturation in the modified version of the method presented here are illustrated diagrammatically in fig 2 the six stages are defined as follows cervical stage 1 cs1 fig 3 the lower borders of all the three vertebrae c2-c4 are flat the bodies of both c3 and c4 are trapezoid in shape the superior border of the vertebral body is tapered from posterior to anterior the peak in mandibular growth will occur on average 2 years after this stage cervical stage 2 cs2 fig 4 a concavity is present at the lower border of c2 in four of five cases with the remaining subjects still showing a cervical stage 1 the bodies of both c3 and c4 are still trapezoid in shape the peak in mandibular growth will occur on average 1 year after this stage cervical stage 3 cs3 fig 5 concavities at the lower borders of both c2 and c3 are present the bodies of c3 and c4 may be either trapezoid or rectangular horizontal in shape figure 3 cervical stage 1 cs1 two clinical examples.
[close]
p. 7
the cvm method and treatment timing 125 figure 6 cervical stage 4 cs4 two clinical examples figure 4 cervical stage 2 cs2 two clinical examples application to dentofacial orthopedics the clinical application of the method to dentofacial orthopedics becomes relevant for those treatment protocols that benefit from the inclusion of the period of accelerated mandibular growth cvm method can be useful as a maturational index to detect the optimal time to start treatment of mandibular deficiencies by means of functional jaw orthopedics.25,26 it has been demonstrated that the effectiveness of functional treatment of class ii skeletal disharmony depends strongly on the biological responsiveness of the condylar cartilage which in turn is related to the growth rate of the mandible.27 cervical stage 6 cs6 fig 8 the concavities at the lower borders of c2 c3 and c4 still are evident at least one of the bodies of c3 and c4 is rectangular vertical in shape if not rectangular vertical the body of the other cervical vertebra is squared the peak in mandibular growth has ended at least 2 years before this stage figure 5 cervical stage 3 cs3 two clinical examples figure 7 cervical stage 5 cs5 two clinical examples.
[close]
p. 8
126 t baccetti l franchi and j.a mcnamara net increase in mandibular length over untreated controls pubertal class ii treatment treatment includes the pubertal peak in mandibular growth 3.6 3.0 2.4 2.7 4.7 3.9 4.3 mm mm mm mm mm mm mm figure 8 cervical stage 6 cs6 two clinical examples table 3 analysis of the literature regarding treatment timing for class ii malocclusion pre-pubertal class ii treatment treatment ends before the pubertal peak in mandibular growth treatment timing for class ii malocclusion an emerging fundamental concept underlying class ii correction is that this type of intervention should be undertaken when the likelihood for a maximum growth response is high that is during the circumpubertal growth period a series of short-term studies has demonstrated statistically and clinically significant correction of the class ii dentoskeletal relationships when either functional appliances or fixed appliances in combination with class ii elastics are used during the circumpubertal period table 3 when class ii malocclusion is treated too early therapy starting at cs1 and completed before the interval of peak velocity in mandibular growth ie before cs3 the net difference in supplementary growth of the mandible expressed cephalometrically by the measurement co-pg or co-gn in the treated samples versus untreated controls ranges between 0.4 mm and 1.8 mm table 3 on the contrary when intervention in a class ii pa mcnamara et al petrovic et al 199429 tulloch et al 199730 keeling et al 199831 baccetti et al 200025 baccetti and franchi 200126 de almeida et al 200232 janson et al 200333 o brien et al 200334 faltin et al 200335 study 198528 fr-2 class ii elastics bionator bionator twin-block fr-2 fr-2 fr-2 twin-block bionator when cs1 or cs2 are diagnosed in the individual patient with mandibular deficiency the clinician can wait at least one additional year for a radiographic reevaluation aimed to start treatment with a functional appliance the appearance of a definite concavity at the lower border of c2 indicates that the growth spurt is approaching that is that the year of the peak will start approximately 1 year after this stage cs3 represents the ideal stage to begin functional jaw orthopedics as the peak in mandibular growth will occur within the year after this observation in the sample examined here total mandibular length exhibited an average increase of 5.4 mm in the year following cs3 a significantly greater increment when compared with the growth interval from cs1 to cs2 about 2.5 mm from cs2 to cs3 again about 2.5 mm and to the postpeak between-stage intervals 1.6 mm and 2.1 mm for the intervals from cs4 to cs5 and from cs5 to cs6 respectively the appraisal of treatment timing in individual studies was based upon chronologic age hand and wrist or cvm method all data are short-term and refer to controlled studies the effect of treatment timing on supplementary elongation of the mandible in class ii treatment net increase in mandibular length over untreated controls appliance 1.2 1.0 1.4 0.4 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.5 1.6 0.8 mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mm mcnamara et al petrovic et al 199429 lund and sandler 199836 franchi et al 199937 baccetti et al 200025 baccetti and franchi 200126 faltin et al 200335 study 198528 fr-2 class ii elastics twin-block acrylic herbst twin-block fr-2 bionator appliance
[close]
p. 9
the cvm method and treatment timing tient includes the cs3-cs4 interval growth spurt the net supplementary growth of the mandible in treated samples versus untreated controls ranges from 2.4 mm to 4.7 mm table 3 the data reported in table 3 suggest also that in class ii patients the timing of therapeutic intervention has a greater impact on supplementary elongation of the mandible than does the type of appliance used the only long-term study that deals with the evaluation of the role of treatment timing in class ii correction35 revealed that the use of a bionator followed by fixed appliances in contrast with untreated class ii controls is able to induce a supplementary elongation of the mandible of less than 2 mm when the functional appliance is used before the peak in mandibular growth and of about 5 mm when the growth spurt is included in the treatment interval these results possess significance not only at the statistical level but also at the clinical level as the correction of a full cusp class ii molar relationship to class i represents a 5 to 6 mm sagittal correction at the level of the occlusal plane treatment timing for class iii malocclusions early treatment of class iii disharmony has been advocated for a long time.38 the clinical understanding that class iii malocclusion is established early in life and that it is not a self-correcting disharmony has led to the recommendation of intervention as early as in the deciduous dentition cephalometric and morphometric investigations using class iii untreated controls have demonstrated that treatment of class iii malocclusion by means of efficient protocols eg maxillary expansion and protraction is more effective in the early than in the late mixed dentition.39-41 until recently however information about the possible role of treatment timing on long-term changes after active therapy for class iii malocclusion was not available in the literature.42 at a postpubertal observation cs5 or cs6 when active growth of the craniofacial skeleton is completed for the most part class iii subjects treated with a rapid maxillary expander and a facial mask well before the growth spurt cs1 present with different long-term changes with respect to class iii subjects treated at a later stage that is at the peak in mandibular growth cs3 prepubertal orthopedic treatment of class iii malocclusion is effective both in the maxilla which shows a supplementary growth of about 2 mm over class iii untreated controls and in the mandible restriction in growth of about 3.5 mm over controls whereas treatment of class iii malocclusion at puberty is effective at the mandibular level only restriction in growth of about 4.5 mm over controls 42 the findings in the maxilla have a biological explanation in the physiology of the circummaxillary sutures which are more amenable to orthopedic intervention during the early stages whereas they become more heavily interdigitated around puberty.43 on the other hand the possibility of restricting mandibular growth both before and during puberty gives the clinician the chance of resuming facemask therapy at a later time when correction of class iii relationships is only partial after the prepubertal intervention 127 treatment timing for transverse maxillary deficiency the issue of treatment timing for maxillary expansion aimed to correct transverse maxillary deficiency has been addressed in the past by melsen44 and by wertz and dreskin.45 melsen used autopsy material to examine histologically the maturation of the midpalatal suture at different developmental stages.44 in the infantile stage up to 10 years of age the suture was broad and smooth whereas in the juvenile stage from 10 to 13 years it had developed in a more typical squamous suture with overlapping sections finally during the adolescent stage 13 and 14 years of age the suture was wavier with increased interdigitation from these histological data the inference is that patients who show an advanced stage of skeletal maturation at the midpalatal suture may have difficulty in undergoing orthopedic maxillary expansion clinical support for the histologic findings by melsen44 is derived from the results of a study by wertz and dreskin45 who noted greater and more stable orthopedic changes in young patients under the age of 12 years either group of researchers however did not use any biological indicator of skeletal maturity to define early versus late treatment the use of the cvm method has been applied recently to the estimate of the effects of different treatment timing on the correction of transverse maxillary deficiency.46 a sample of 42 patients was compared with a control sample of 20 subjects posteroanterior cephalograms were analyzed for each of the treated subjects at t1 pretreatment t2 immediate postexpansion and t3 long-term observation films were available at t1 and at t3 for the controls the mean age at t1 was 11 years and 10 months for both the treated and the control groups the mean ages at t3 also were comparable 20 years 6 months for the treated group and 17 years 8 months for the control group following rapid maxillary expansion and retention 2 months on average fixed standard edgewise appliances were placed the study included transverse measurements on dentoalveolar structures maxillary and mandibular bases and other craniofacial regions nasal zygomatic orbital and cranial treated and control samples were divided into two groups according to individual skeletal maturation as evaluated by the cvm method the early treated and early control groups consisted of subjects who had not reached the pubertal peak in skeletal growth velocity at t1 cs1 through cs3 whereas the late-treated and late control groups were comprised of subjects during or slightly after the peak at t1 cs4 through cs6 the group treated before the pubertal peak showed significantly greater short-term increases in the width of the nasal cavities in the long-term increments in maxillary skeletal width maxillary intermolar width lateronasal width and latero-orbitale width were significantly greater in the early-treated group when compared with the corresponding control group the late-treated group exhibited significant increases in lateronasal width and in maxillary and mandibular intermolar widths the use of the cvm method demonstrated that rapid maxillary expansion before the peak in skeletal growth velocity is able to induce more pronounced transverse craniofacial changes at the skeletal level treat-
[close]
p. 10
128 ment changes are more dentoalveolar in nature when expansion is performed during or after the peak treatment timing for increased vertical dimension the cvm method also has been applied to the appraisal of ideal treatment timing for a specific therapeutic protocol for the correction of vertical excess of the face by means of a bonded rapid maxillary expander in association with a vertical-pull chincup one of the goals of orthopedic treatment in subjects with increased vertical dimension is the control of the vertical growth of the mandibular ramus expressed cephalometrically by the measure co-go available shortterm data from our research group show that a significantly more favorable effect can be obtained when treatment is performed at cs3 that is at the peak in mandibular growth when compared with treatment performed at an earlier maturational stage cs1 no significant increase in ramal height is observed in hyperdivergent subjects treated at cs1 whereas a significant increase of about 2 mm more than in untreated controls is recorded in hyperdivergent subjects who receive orthopedic treatment at cs3 t baccetti l franchi and j.a mcnamara effective in the mandible during both prepubertal and pubertal stages 3 skeletal effects of rapid maxillary expansion for the correction of transverse maxillary deficiency are greater at prepubertal stages while pubertal or postpubertal use of the rapid maxillary expander entails more dentoalveolar effects and 4 deficiency of mandibular ramus height can be enhanced significantly in subjects with increased vertical facial dimension when orthopedic treatment is performed at the peak in mandibular growth cs3 to summarize effects of therapies aimed to enhance/restrict mandibular growth appear to be of greater magnitude at the circumpubertal period during which the growth spurt occurs in comparison to earlier intervention while effects of therapies aimed to alter the maxilla orthopedically maxillary protraction/maxillary expansion are greater at prepubertal stages the cvm method can be helpful for the assessment of completion of active growth in studies dealing with the longterm effects of orthodontic/orthopedic treatment strategies similarly the method can be used to identify clinically the adequate time for intervention in subjects who need surgery for the late correction of facial disharmonies due to its practical applications the cvm method appears to be a powerful diagnostic tool the implementation of the method in orthodontic decision making allows for an improvement of treatment outcomes by combining effective and efficient protocols with optimal treatment timing final remarks the cvm method is comprised of six maturational stages cervical stage 1 through cervical stage 6 cs1-cs6 with the peak in mandibular growth occurring between cs3 and cs4 the pubertal peak has not been reached without the attainment of both cs1 and cs2 in particular the detection of cs2 indicates that the growth spurt is approaching and it will start at cs3 which is approximately 1 year after cs2 active growth is virtually completed when the cs6 is attained the method is particularly useful when skeletal maturity has to be appraised on a single cephalogram and only the cervical vertebrae from the second one through the fourth one are visible the cvm method has the further advantage to be assessed on the lateral cephalogram which is the radiographic record used routinely for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning the use of a reliable biological indicator of skeletal maturity such as the cvm method is highly recommended for a wide variety of research and clinical applications in both prospective and retrospective controlled studies cvm stages enable the researcher to categorize treated/untreated subjects for a biologically appropriate matching between experimental and control samples further the appraisal of the cvm stage in the individual subject allows for a more precise definition of early and late samples in studies aimed to determine the role of treatment timing in the effectiveness of different treatment protocols for the correction of malocclusions to date the application of the method in investigations on treatment timing in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics has revealed that 1 class ii treatment is most effective when it includes the peak in mandibular growth 2 class iii treatment with maxillary expansion and protraction is effective in the maxilla only when it is performed before the peak cs1 or cs2 whereas it is references 1 nanda rs the rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms am j orthod 41:658-673 1955 2 björk a variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method j dent res 42:400-411 1963 3 hunter cj the correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence angle orthod 36:44-54 1966 4 ekström c facial growth rate and its relation to somatic maturation in healthy children swed dent j suppl 11:1-99 1982 5 lewis a roche af wagner b pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible comparisons within individuals angle orthod 55:17-30 1985 6 hägg u pancherz h taranger j pubertal growth and orthodontic treatment in carlson ds ribbens ka eds craniofacial growth during adolescence craniofacial growth series vol 20 ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 1987 pp 87-115 7 greulich ww pyle si radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist stanford stanford university press 1959 8 björk a helm s prediction of the age of maximum puberal growth in body height angle orthod 37:134-143 1967 9 tofani m mandibular growth at puberty am j orthod 62:176-194 1972 10 hägg u taranger j skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt acta odontol scand 38:187-200 1980 11 hellman m the process of dentition and its effects on occlusion dent cosmos 65:1329-1344 1923 12 lewis ab garn sm the relationship between tooth formation and other maturation factors angle orthod 30:70-77 1960
[close]
p. 11
the cvm method and treatment timing 13 tanner jm growth at adolescence 2nd ed oxford blackwell scientific publications 1962 14 hägg u taranger j menarche and voice changes as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt acta odontol scand 38:179-186 1980 15 lamparski dg skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae unpublished master s thesis pittsburgh pa department of orthodontics university of pittsburgh 1972 16 o reilly m yanniello gj mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae a longitudinal cephalometric study angle orthod 58:179-184 1988 17 franchi l baccetti t the use of maturational indices for the identification of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics in mcnamara ja jr kelly ka eds treatment timing orthodontics in four dimensions craniofacial growth series vol 39 ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 2002 pp 151-170 18 franchi l baccetti t mcnamara ja jr mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height am j orthod dentofacial orthop 118:335-340 2000 19 baccetti t franchi l mcnamara ja jr an improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation cvm method for the assessment of mandibular growth angle orthod 72:316-323 2002 20 hassel b farman a skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae am j orthod dentofacial orthop 107:58-66 1995 21 pancherz h szyska m analyse der halswirbelkörper statt der handknochen zur bestimmung der skelettalen und somatischen reife iok 32:151-161 2000 22 grave k townsend g cervical vertebral maturation as a predictor of the adolescent growth spurt aust orthod j 19:25-32 2003 23 riolo ml moyers re mcnamara ja jr et al an atlas of craniofacial growth cephalometric standards from the university school growth study the university of michigan monograph 2 craniofacial growth series ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 1974 24 hellsing e cervical vertebral dimensions in 8 11 and 15-year-old children acta odontol scand 49:207-213 1991 25 baccetti t franchi l toth lr et al treatment timing for twin block therapy am j orthod dentofacial orthop 118:159-170 2000 26 baccetti t franchi l maximizing esthetic and functional changes in class ii treatment by means of appropriate treatment timing in mcnamara ja jr kelly ka eds new frontiers in facial esthetics craniofacial growth series vol 38 ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 2001 pp 237-251 27 petrovic a stutzmann j lavergne j mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances a cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making in carlson ds ed craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment craniofacial growth series vol 23 ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 1990 pp 13-74 28 mcnamara ja jr bookstein fl shaughnessy tg skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class ii patients am j orthod 88:91-110 1985 129 29 petrovic a stutzmann j crescita sagittale della mandibola mediante edgewise ed elastici di ii classe ortognatod it 3:93-108 1994 30 tulloch jfc phillips c koch g et al the effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in class ii malocclusion a randomized clinical trial am j orthod dentofacial orthop 111:391-400 1997 31 keeling sd wheeler tt king gj et al anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early class ii treatment with bionators and headgear am j orthod dentofacial orthop 113:40-50 1998 32 de almeida mr henriques jf ursi w comparative study of the fränkel fr-2 and bionator appliances in the treatment of class ii malocclusion am j orthod dentofacial orthop 121:458-466 2002 33 janson gr toruno jl martins dr et al class ii treatment effects of the frankel appliance eur j orthod 25:301-309 2003 34 o brien k wright j conboy f et al effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the twin-block appliance a multicenter randomized controlled trial part 1 dental and skeletal effects am j orthod dentofacial orthop 124:234-243 2003 35 faltin k faltin rm baccetti t et al long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for bionator therapy angle orthod 73:221-230 2003 36 lund di sandler pj the effects of twin blocks a prospective controlled study am j orthod dentofacial orthop 113:104-110 1998 37 franchi l baccetti t mcnamara ja jr treatment and posttreatment effects of acrylic splint herbst appliance therapy am j orthod dentofacial orthop 115:429-438 1999 38 graber tm orthodontics principles and practice philadelphia wb saunders 1972 pp 705-708 39 baccetti t mcgill js franchi l et al skeletal effects of early treatment of class iii malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy am j orthod dentofacial orthop 113:333-343 1998 40 franchi l baccetti t mcnamara ja jr shape-coordinate analysis induced by rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy am j orthod dentofacial orthop 114:418-426 1998 41 baccetti t franchi l updating cephalometrics through morphometrics thin-plate spline analysis of craniofacial growth/treatment changes in mcnamara ja jr ed growth modification what works what doesn t and why monograph no 35 craniofacial growth series ann arbor mi center for human growth and development university of michigan 1999 pp 257-273 42 franchi l baccetti t mcnamara ja jr post-pubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances am j orthod dentofacial orthop 126:555568 2004 43 melsen b melsen f the postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material am j orthod 82:329-342 1982 44 melsen b palatal growth studied on human autopsy material a histologic microradiographic study am j orthod 68:42-54 1975 45 wertz r dreskin m midpalatal suture opening a normative study am j orthod 71:367-381 1977 46 baccetti t franchi l cameron cg et al treatment timing for rapid maxillary expansion angle orthod 71:343-350 2001
[close]